KAJIAN ISLAM INTER DAN MULTI-DISIPLINER PEMIKIRAN FAZLUR RAHMAN TERHADAP PENDIDIKAN ISLAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55558/alihda.v19i1.179Keywords:
Fazlur Rahman, Islamic Education, IntegrationAbstract
Fazlur Rahman is a Muslim scholar who has critical thinking about changes and developments in Islamic education. His thoughts were the pros and cons of his time and became an important study in this era. For this reason, research was carried out using the library research method. According to Rahman, the aim of Islamic education is to develop humans into fully functioning beings, and to save humans from themselves, for themselves, and to respect themselves. The current generation is facing serious problems due to dichotomization, which has led to the emergence of split personalities. To overcome this problem, the Islamic generation needs to receive modern education that integrates Islamic principles. Islamic education must be an agent of reform that can adapt to current developments without losing its fundamental values.
References
Abou El Fadl K. Islam and the Challenge of Modernity: Fazlur Rahman’s Intellectual Legacy. Oxford University Press.; 2023.
Alatas SF. Contemporary Islamic Thought: Revisiting Fazlur Rahman’s Intellectual Legacy." Journal of Islamic Studies. J Islam Stud. 2021;32(3):421–35.
Aziz N. Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman Tentang Filsafat Pendidikan Dalam Islam. Manarul Qur’an J Ilm Stud Islam. 2019;19(2):82–93.
Kamali MH. Revisiting Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement Approach in Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence. Islam Stud Rev. 2023;41(1):63–79.
Khatami M, Dina S. Risalah : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Modernisasi Pendidikan Islam Perspektif Fazlur Rahman dan Relevansinya dengan Pendidikan Islam Kontemporer. 2024;10(1):184–94.
Ryzka Dwi Kurnia. Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman Mengenai Politik Islam. Polit J Huk Tata Negara dan Polit Islam. 2021;8(2):25–41.
Safi O. Reconstructing Islamic Thought: Fazlur Rahman and Modern Islamic Reform. Routledge; 2022.
Zaman MQ. Islamic Modernism: Reflections on Fazlur Rahman. Mod Intellect Hist. 2022;19(2):389–407.
