PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LEARNING CYCLE-5E BERORIENTASI SSI TERHADAP PENGETAHUAN EPISTEMIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55558/alihda.v19i2.119Keywords:
Learning Cycle 5E, SSI, Epistemic Knowledge, Scientific LiteracyAbstract
21st century education aims to improve students' scientific literacy skills. Scientific literacy is important for students so that they not only understand science as a concept but can also apply science in everyday life. This research aims to determine the effect of the SSI-oriented Learning Cycle 5E model on epistemic knowledge. The results of the research showed that experimental class II students obtained an average score for working on questions of 6.97, then the average score for experimental class I was 5.92 and the average score in the control class was 4.19. Thus, it shows that the SSI-oriented Learning Cycle 5E model has a better impact on learning compared to the two models used, namely Learning Cycle-5E and the direct learning method.
References
Allchin, Duglas. 2014. From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View from the Classroom. Springer. 23: 1911-1932. DOI 10.1007/s11191-013-9672-8.
Ardianto, D. dan Rubbini, B. 2016. Comparison of Students Scientific Literacy In Integrated Science Learning Through Model of Guided Discovery and Problem Based Learning. Indonesian Journal of Science Education. 5(1), 31-37.
Celik, Suat. 2014. Chemical Literacy Levels of Science and Mathematics Teacher Candidates. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 39 (1), 1-15.
Choi, Kyunghee, et al. 2011. Re-Conceptualization of Scientific Literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. 48(6): 670-697.
Creswell, J.E.2012 Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’ Argumentation Skills about Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education. 40, 133-148.
Effendy. 2007. A-Level Chemistry for Senior High SchoolStudents (Volume 1A). Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Eisenkraft, Arthur. 2003. Expanding the 5E Model. The Science Teacher; 70,6; Proquest Education Journal. 56.
Kemendikbud. 2014a. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 59 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 SMA. Jakarta: kemendikbud.
Kurnia, F. 2014. Analisis Bahan Ajar Fisika SMA Kelas XI di Kecamatan Indralaya Utara Berdasarkan Kategori Literasi Sains. Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika. 1(1), 43-47.
Lederman, N.G., Khalick, et al. 2002. Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assesment of Learners’s Conceptions of nature of Science. Journal of Research In Science Teaching. 39(6), 497-521.
PISA.2015. PISA 2015 Result. OECD. Dari https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.
PISA-OECD. 2004. Learning for Tomorrow’s World. USA: OECD-PISA. Dari http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34002216.pdf.
Polyem, T., Nuangchalem, P., and Wongchantra, P. 2011. Learnimg Achievement, Science Procces Skills, and Moral Reasoning of Ninth Grade Students Learned by 7E Learning Cycle and Sosioscientific Issue based Learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5 (10), 257-564.
Qawasmeh, Rasha Mohammad., & All, Ahmad Al S, 2017. The Effect of Using Computerized 5E’s Learning Cycle Model on Acquiring Scientific Concepts among Fourth Graders. American Journal of Educational Research. 5(5) 579-587. DOI: 10.12691/education-5-5-17.
Sadler, Troy. D. 2014. Socio-scientific Issues based Teaching and Learning: Hydrofracturing as an Illustrative context of a Framework for Implementation and Research. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências. 14(2).
Sutrisna, Nana. 2021. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik SMA di Kota Sungai Penuh. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian 1(12), 2683-2694.
Tsai, C.Y. 2015. Improving Students’ PISA Scientific Competencies Through Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(2), 321-339.
